The EU Foreign Affairs chief unveiled her proposals for the establishment of the EU’s new diplomatic service on 25 March. The European External Action Service (EEAS) is being established as a result of the Lisbon Treaty. Its objective will be to develop a more consistent and effective European foreign policy.

Under the proposal Ashton, and her diplomatic service, would be in charge of the EU’s multi billion development budget, controlling the strategic overview, and use of the funds. The European Commission, which has up until now managed the use of the budget, would only be charged with implementation.

MEPs were quick to criticize the proposals saying that they were “a recipe for incoherence”. Civil society organizations have also criticized the proposals. Social Watch, a global network of civil society organizations said it took exception to the deal between the Commission and the High Representative to incorporate development cooperation into the new foreign service.

“Public resources earmarked in the budget for poverty eradication in poor countries will be spent for the promotion of Europe’s strategic interests in foreign policy and security” said Social Watch’s Coordinator Roberto Bissio. Professor Edward Oyugi of the Social Development Network in Kenya added that “his sounds like a move to undermine the democratic integrity of the European Union.”

Eurostep has questioned the legitimacy of the proposals. “It goes against the spirit and the letter of the Lisbon Treaty which puts development co-operation clearly under Commission responsibility with Parliamentary oversight”.

Sources:

• EUobserver
• DevWire.eu
• Eurostep

• The dysfuntionality of the EEAS
• EU diplomatic service responds to a fresh set of criticism coming from the member states
• The ongoing implementation of the EEAS
• Is there any commitment to an effective EU common foreign policy?
• Ashton responds to concerns raised in light of new External Action Service
• The EU looks to civil society organisations in the Arab region
• European External Action Service: Much remains to be done
• Ashton appoints two Managing Directors for the EEAS
• EEAS to launch on 1 December
• Parliament wins greater powers over EEAS
• Potential Delay in EEAS Launch
• Parliament demands more control over EEAS budget
• Amnesty raises concerns over position of human rights in EEAS
• MEPs protest EEAS appointments by delaying vote
• The European External Actions Service (EEAS)
• Ashton aims for balance over top EEAS appointments
• MEPs protest imbalanced EEAS appointments
• Half of DG Development staff to be moved to EEAS
• EU Parliament finally approves EEAS
• These meetings are like capacity building - for whom?
• Final details of EEAS emerge
• A political agreement reached on creation of EEAS
• Community method - the make or break for EP agreement on the EEAS
• National parliamentarians discuss EEAS with MEPs
• Should we reject Ashton's proposals on establishing the EEAS?
• Ashton's team expect agreement soon on terms for establish the EEAS
• Development policy within the External Action Service
• Development-proofing the European External Action Service
• The Development Commissioner must have full responsibility and authority over development, urge NGOs
• No progress in turf war over EEAS
• Negotiations on the EEAS need development perspective
• Court of Auditors adds its voice to concerns over EEAS
• Ashton’s EEAS proposal breaches EU law
• Lawyers say Ashton's EEAS proposal is contrary to Lisbon Treaty
• Parliament links budget approval to agreement on EEAS organisation
• Green perspectives on EEAS: Debate with Civil Society
• Ashton's proposal for the EEAS contradicts the intentions of the Treaty
• Ashton outlines organisational structure of EEAS
• MEPs' anger over EEAS
• Establishing the EEAS in conformity with the Treaty
• EU Commission and Member States battle for control of EEAS
• EU institutions struggle for control of EEAS
• Commission discusses terms of recruitment for EEAS
• Ashton sidelines Parliament in creation of EEAS working group
• Briefing No. 48: Defining the EU's Management and Implementation of its External Actions
• Briefing No. 44: Five Compelling Reasons why to keep Development outside the EEAS