Following majority approval by the European Parliament at the last plenary session in Strasbourg before the summer break, the final preparations for establishing the European External Action Service (EEAS) are underway. The latest plans envisage the Commission’s Directorate General for Development being divided, with around half of its 300 staff being subsumed into the EEAS.

DG Development’s departments for governance and thematics are to be divided, and geographical desks will be entirely incorporated into the EEAS. DG Development will retain expert staff responsible for the substance of development policy and cross-cutting issues such as education and good governance.

An article in New Europe suggested that these changes “would leave a rump DG Development, which would probably be restructured along with Aidco”. However, Development Commissioner Andris Piebalgs stated: “I do not believe there will be a big revolution in-house... At this stage, there is no merger.”

In European Voice’s special report on EU development policy last week, Tobey Vogel elaborated: “The EEAS will help prepare overall aid allocations and strategies for individual countries, but responsibility will be in the hands of the development commissioner, whose role vis-à-vis the EEAS was amplified as a result of negotiations between Ashton and the European Parliament last month. To take effect, strategic policy and programming decisions will require the endorsement of the college of commissioners”.

Vogel quotes a diplomat’s opinion that the separation of the thematic experts from the country desks is the greatest threat to maintaining a poverty-focused development policy. “If the thematic experts remain at the [Commission's] directorate-general for development and the EEAS is responsible for strategic programming, then who will ensure that the thematic issues are properly reflected?” said the diplomat.

Sources:

• New Europe
• European Voice

• EU Parliament finally approves EEAS
• These meetings are like capacity building - for whom?
• Final details of EEAS emerge
• A political agreement reached on creation of EEAS
• Community method - the make or break for EP agreement on the EEAS
• National parliamentarians discuss EEAS with MEPs
• Should we reject Ashton's proposals on establishing the EEAS?
• Ashton's team expect agreement soon on terms for establish the EEAS
• Development policy within the External Action Service
• Development-proofing the European External Action Service
• The Development Commissioner must have full responsibility and authority over development, urge NGOs
• No progress in turf war over EEAS
• Negotiations on the EEAS need development perspective
• Court of Auditors adds its voice to concerns over EEAS
• Ashton’s EEAS proposal breaches EU law
• Lawyers say Ashton's EEAS proposal is contrary to Lisbon Treaty
• Parliament links budget approval to agreement on EEAS organisation
• Green perspectives on EEAS: Debate with Civil Society
• EU’s new diplomatic service to control development budget
• Ashton's proposal for the EEAS contradicts the intentions of the Treaty
• Ashton outlines organisational structure of EEAS
• MEPs' anger over EEAS
• Establishing the EEAS in conformity with the Treaty
• EU Commission and Member States battle for control of EEAS
• EU institutions struggle for control of EEAS
• Commission discusses terms of recruitment for EEAS
• Ashton sidelines Parliament in creation of EEAS working group
• Briefing No. 48: Defining the EU's Management and Implementation of its External Actions
• Briefing No. 44: Five Compelling Reasons why to keep Development outside the EEAS

• Intellectual property rights prevent poor from accessing medicines
• HIV-related mortality could be reduced by 20% between 2010 and 2015
• New WHO code aims to curb health worker “brain drain”
• Ashton should be more outspoken on human rights, says MEP