![]() |
|
|
The European Commission’s Directorate General for Trade last week organised a seminar in Brussels titled Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) of trade agreements: making trade sustainable. The aim of the seminar, which brought civil society organisations, private sector representatives and government representatives together with consultants commissioned to carry out the assessments, was to offer a platform for exchanges and reflections on the assessments being carried out by the Commission. It was supposed to address the EU’s strategy for SIAs, the trade negotiations frameworks, and the methodology, process and content of SIAs.
Following the Gothenburg and Laeken EU Councils of Head of States, the European Commission is now obliged to carry out sustainability impact assessments of all major EU policy initiatives. Sustainability is looked at in terms of three pillars: economic, environmental and social. Levels of poverty are supposed to be an important indicator in assessing sustainability.
Eurostep was represented by Guggi Laryea. Representatives from member organisations - KEPA and WEED/terre des hommes were also present. The Seminar included separate workshops on most of the different trade negotiations/agreements that the EU is engaged in, i.e. WTO, EU-Chile/Mercosur, EU-MEDA and EU-ACP.
In the workshop on EU-ACP trade Eurostep put forward the following suggestions:
- It should be recognised that the responsibility for implementing the findings of the SIA should be shared by the EU and the ACP. It should not be seen as only an ACP responsibility.
- The negotiations themselves need to be made far more transparent and accessible to stakeholders if the SIA process is going to effectively contribute to new ACP-EU trade arrangements.
- New efficient methods of capacity building in support of developing countries and their citizens to participate in the SIA process and to implement the findings of SIAs are needed. The funds for this and mechanisms for disbursement should be clearly identified.
- There needs to be a concerted effort to synchronise the SIA process to the negotiations as regards its timetable and its ability to input in the negotiations.
- The SIA process should be given high level political support and involve discussions with Member States, the European Parliament and the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly.
If all the above conditions are met, especially that regarding the making SIAs more participatory, then following consultation with stakeholders, the findings of the SIA process need to be fully integrated in the outcome of the negotiations, i.e. the new trade arrangements. They should be legally binding and be monitored with safeguards for implementation.
For more information of the SIA on ACP-EU Trade see http://www.sia-acp.org/acp/uk/news.php. An official report of the seminar should be shortly available.2. Third ACP-EU Ambassadorial trade negotiations round - ACP secretariat press conference
The 3rd ACP-EU ambassadorial trade negotiations round took place this week in Brussels. Issues on the agenda included: legal affairs, flanking measures and implications of Economic Partnership Agreements, agriculture and fisheries agreements, and preparations for the 4th ACP-EU Ministerial Trade Committee. At a press conference following the meeting, the ACP Secretary General, Mr Goulongana, stated that the parties had been able to identify points on which they agree on, however there has been little agreement on the following:
- The ACP is of the view that there should be additional financial resources included in the package of Economic Partnership Agreements. The EU however feels that existing resources are adequate.
- The EU view the principle of gradual elimination of barriers to trade stated in the Cotonou Agreement as a call for trade reciprocity, but the ACP believe that there should be an in depth examination of how this principle is applied taking account of levels of development.
The ACP believes that there should be six distinct groupings of issues for discussions in the negotiations: legal questions, market access, trade related areas, services, agriculture, and fisheries. But the EU is of the view that many of these issues could be discussed within one grouping.
The next ACP-EU trade ministerial committee will take place on 27 February- 1 March in Saint Lucia.
On other trade related issues, the Secretary General at the press conference expressed the ACP’s interests and concerns about the WTO negotiations relating to the question of access to medicines and the discussions around Special and Differentiated Treatment. Another issue of concern to the ACP is the challenges being made by ‘third parties’ to ACP trade preferences with the EU. Talking about the recent challenge to ACP preferences on trade in tuna by the Philippines, he said some EU Member States have failed to back the ACP within the WTO. He said the ACP would be pushing the EU within the WTO to be more consistent in backing the preferences to the ACP that it has committed itself to.3. In brief
© Eurostep. Please address comments to [email protected]